Sulaimaniyah, Feb. 10 (AKnews) – A  boycott against a Kurdish newspaper in Erbil imposed by newsagents  saying it contains “blasphemy” has been interpreted as a ”dangerous”  beginning to a deepening lack of understanding between intellectuals and  clerics in Kurdistan.
 
The  Awene newspaper published on Tuesday an article by the Kurdish  intellectual, writer and poet Mohammed Mukri defending a poet whose book  was banned in the stores last month after clerics rallied against a  poem in his book that described God in a way they said was  “blasphemous”. 
The ban on the book had already stirred a lot of  tension between intellectuals and clerics in the region. Intellectuals  accused clerics of inciting people against their freedom of thought and  written expression, and of slander in their Friday sermons, while the  clerics accused them in turn of disregarding social and religious norms  and values.
“Since our community is Muslim by majority,  everybody has to respect the religious principles of the community, but  neither newsagents nor anybody else can judge what is forbidden and what  is not for people,” said Kawa Mahmoud, Kurdistan Regional Government  (KRG)’s spokesman.
“This is not their business, freedom of  thought has to be guaranteed for all in Kurdistan with all the different  religious and ways of thinking” Mahmoud said.
As well as  defending Qubadi Jalizada  in his article, Mukri included a poem by the  poet whose book of poems “Styani Bafr Pra la Rishola” (The Corset of  Snow is Full of Starlings) sparked an outcry among clerics who attacked  him in their Friday sermons and accused him of blasphemy for his  depiction of God in an “improper way”.
Jalizada describes God in  his poem as sitting with legs outstretched,“tired” and “angry” with  mankind. Jalizada’s God is “helpless” in face of the vices and evils of  man.
Any personification of God or the attribution of physical characteristics to Him is strictly forbidden in Islam.
The  book was subsequently banned from the stores after the clerics, the  ministry of endowment and religious affairs and the committee of  religious affairs in parliament mounted pressure.
Following the  ban on the book, intellectuals pushed on the parliament of Kurdistan for  a bill that would curtail the influence of clerics and mosques on  written freedom in the future. 
They submitted a proposal to  parliament according to which, in any of the three provinces of the  Kurdistan Region there will be three sermons in three major mosques and  these sermons will be broadcast on TV and in other mosques live instead  of different sermons in the different mosques.
The fights  between the two parties continued for almost two week before the  President of the Kurdistan Region Massoud Barzani brought them together  to sit and discuss ways to ease the tensions.
“All we say is  that different views have to be respected in our country, and nobody  should watch and judge anybody else” the KRG spokesman, who is also the  minister of culture, said.
“We have started to feel that the  issue between clerics and intellectuals is being used for a political  purpose” he says, “therefore, on Saturday, the KRG will hold a dialogue  conference between the clerics and intellectuals to find ways to solve  the issue”.
The clerics are supported by Islamic parties and factions of the Kurdish parliament.
Peshawa  Sardar, researcher in media and communications at the University of  Rome in Italy said, “This is a dangerous beginning, widening the lack of  mutual understanding and further deteriorating the social and cultural  situation of the Kurdish community because this will allow an individual  political actor to easily exploit newsagents to create tensions”.
“I  believe it is the duty of the municipality or the Erbil provincial  council to punish those newsagents” he said, “so that they can no longer  impose meaningless censorships on newspapers and journals”.
But  Sardar also believed that the newspapers also had to respect the  sanctities and the faith of the majority of the Kurdish community.
Meanwhile,  neither the Writers Union nor the Journalists Syndicate has taken a  stance condemning or at least begrudging the attitude of the newsagents.  Intellectuals have started to doubt the position of the two bodies in  such matters.  
Idris Abdulqadir Ali, a writer and journalist,  says “the Writers Union and Journalists Syndicate are to be blamed for  this situation, they must take severe stances” he said, “unfortunately  neither of these organizations have expressed a single word of  discontent, but…when it comes to supporting the government they are  present and ready to issue dozens of statements”.
“Clerics have  been pounding on writers and journalist in different ways for a while,”  Ali continued, “I think this attitude will contribute to an increase in  tensions and violence in our community rather than urging coexistence  and calm” .
Reported by Kamaran Subhan, edited by Raber Y. Aziz