| Erbil,  Nov. 9 (AKnews) – Lawmakers in  Kurdistan Region are polarized over a  draft law requiring beforehand  permission for demonstrations from the  authorities passed recently by  the parliament.
  Under   the bill passed on Nov. 3 by a majority vote, any demonstration in   Kurdistan Region has to be authorized by the ministry of the interior   before demonstrators take to the streets. officials say the law is to   regulate the demonstrations and that the security forces provide   security for the demonstrators.
 
 However, the opposition factions   and the civil society organizations are upset about the bill and   consider it restrictions on the right of citizens to demonstrate and   raise their voices. They called on the president Massoud Barzani to not   sign on the bill and return it to parliament for amendments.
 
 "We   thought that the bill would be passed to expand the freedoms of the   people in Kurdistan" said Sargul Qaradaghi, an MP in the Gorran faction   in the parliament of Kurdistan region, "it is regrettable that it was   passed by a majority vote despite expressing our concerns about some   articles of the draft law"
 
 The Opposition, which includes the   Gorran movement, the Kurdistan Islamic Union (KIU), and the Islamic   Group (IG) considered the bill as "restricting the freedom of   demonstrating". They were particularly concerned about an article which   requires beforehand permission from the authorities for any   demonstration. The law also does not allow unexpected demonstrations.
 
 The   demonstrations bill has been submitted to the president of the   Kurdistan Region Massoud Barzani. Upon Barzani's singing, the bill will   be put into effect.
 
 According to the amended Law No. 1 of 2005,   the president has to sign or reject the law in 15 days. If the period   expired and the president did not reject the bill, it will automatically   be effective.
 
 "Demonstration is a right of the citizens and can   not be restricted by laws. The demonstrators only need to inform the   relevant authorities so that they can provide security and safety for   them not permissions" said the Gorran member.
 
 The majorities of   the demonstrations in Kurdistan Region have been unexpected in response   to certain decisions by the government that some people have found   "unfair" and did not have time to inform the relevant authorities, which   had to be addressed separately in the bill, according to him.
 
 Another   Gorran lawmaker, Zana Raof, said requiring people to have permission  to  demonstrate will alter the law from a constitutional guarantee of  the  citizens rights to a "weapon in the hands of ministry of the  interior"  and which might be used for personal purposes and preventing   demonstrators.
 
 "Also, not fitting the unexpected demonstrations   in the law will crate a big problem for the internal security forces,  as  people usually take to the streets all of a sudden," he said, "what  was  passed contains dangerous implications and restricts the  constitutional  rights of people"
 
 "There are demonstrations for  certain issues  which require immediate solutions and can not wait for  two days to first  inform the authorities and then the authority in  turn, reply in another  two days" said Omar Abdul Aziz, head of the KIU  action in the Kurdish  parliament.
 
 The differences on the bill  have driven a wedge even  between the lawmakers of the Kurdistani  Alliance which includes the two  ruling parties in the region: the  Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and  the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan  (PUK).
 
 Some of them believe that  the law restricts freedoms  while others argue that the law is suitable  for Kurdistan Region in the  current unstable stage of Iraq and could be  reformed later.
 
 "The  law contains many flaws," said Rafiq Sabir  of the Kurdistani Alliance,  "because freedom of demonstration is  restricted when permission is  required. In some articles, it is against  the law number 17 of 1993  which stipulates that only informing the  authorities is required for a  demonstration… the bill does not comply  with the developing democracy  in Kurdistan"
 
 Those who argue that  the bill is necessary cite  security as the main reason to support the  bill. "Kurdistan is part of  Iraq, it can not be viewed as different"  says Aso Karim, another member  of the Kurdistan Alliance, "whenever the  terrorism is curtailed in  Iraq and Kurdistan, then the law can be  amended"
 
 Some observers have dubbed Kurdistan Region "the Other Iraq" its security and stability.
 
 Though   demonstration needs permission from the authorities in advance, but   this does not mean they will be able to reject a request for one without   good reason, according to Karim.
 
 Recently, hundreds of students   took to the streets without prior notice to the authorities after they   had applied to the universities of Kurdistan Region but were not   admitted.
 
 Shorish Mohammed Amin, head of the NGO Federation in   Kurdistan which includes 15 organizations, said the law was more "to   block demos than organize them… as if the demonstrators were the enemies   of the government and the country,"
 
 He said they will continue a   campaign they have started to collect signatures against the bill and   will urge the president Massoud Barzani to return the draft back to the   parliament for reforms.
 
 "Passing the law will harm the  democracy  in Kurdistan and is reminiscent of the Baath regime days when   demonstrations were not allowed"
 
 Reported by Dler Abdulrahman
 Editted by Raber Y. Aziz
 | 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be automatically published without any moderation.